Showing posts with label presentism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label presentism. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

The Idea of Privilege

My Assessment
I've spent a great deal of time contemplating the idea of privilege.  As a white person, I'm often told I have always had privilege.  As an American I'm often told I have always had privilege.  I've been exploring this, wanting to give the idea of my privilege the attention it deserves, and assess how it affects my view of things.

First, I do absolutely agree that the idea of "white privilege" exists.  I also agree that sometimes, especially when dealing with racists, I hold a great deal of white privilege.  It ends there, however.  I've never been given anything because I am white.  No doors or opportunities have opened because I am white.  No economic benefits have been mine because of my race.  That said, I do know that sometimes happens.  It just hasn't happened in my world.

Growing up white and poor isn't really all that different from growing up black and poor.  You simply don't have what others have; not because of your race but because of your circumstance and in this case color does not directly affect my circumstance.  In fact, when race is factored in, I have had certain DISadvantages. 

First, there is the idea of giving opportunity as part of quotas and "affirmative action".  I believe that programs like this have run their course of usefulness.  It's time that we are all treated equally.  If a person of color is more qualified (or more needy, depending on the award) then by all means that person should be chosen over me.  I come from an era where persons of color were given priority in college placement and financial aid.  I wasn't privileged beyond having the guts to try college anyway.  That is not racial, that is environmental.  My upbringing, and to a certain extent my culture, made me tough and curious.  That isn't racial.

I'm told, in argument, that my culture is what gave me privilege.   If poor West Virginia is privilege in any color, I will eat my hat.  There are, of course, pockets of privilege culturally--some because of being white, some because of not being white, but generally, my "culture" gave me no privilege.  There are a great many black West Virginians my age who are far more successful and accepted than I am.

Some argue privilege in expectations.  They say white persons are expected to be successful and black persons are not.  To an extent, that might be true, but there are other sides of that.  Because I was a smart white teenager with a great deal of "drive" it was expected that I would attend college, graduate (probably with honors) and go on the have a financially successful life. There's a lot of pressure there, and I wasn't up to it.  That was 40 years ago, and right now, being a smart, driven black person has a better chance than I ever did with a bit less expectation because we are conditioned to believe that person is somehow disadvantaged.   Combined with quotas, this person of color *may* actually have more privilege than I did; and far less pressure to succeed.  When a person of color doesn't succeed as expected, they (and many others) can play the race card-"I was destined to fail because of my color".  No, the truth is we all fail at some point.  I failed college quite grandly, regardless of race.  I also watched persons of color with lesser academic credentials be accepted into universities I couldn't get into; because of color.  I watched persons of color be handed financial supports I wasn't entitled to; because of color.

Fast forward to adulthood, and when things went south in my marriage nobody ever said it was because either of us were black.  When I moved with my two small children to a trailer outside of town, I wasn't allowed to live there because I was white.  I didn't get welfare because I was white.  What I got was massive amounts of disappointment and judgement.  Thirty years ago even an abused white woman was expected to succeed-because she was white.

Twenty years ago, with a new husband and lots more experience and maturity, I started a new life in Toronto, Ontario.  It quickly became apparent that there were vast numbers of people of color and not quite so many white, at least in my environment.  Less than ten percent of the families in my high rise apartment building are white.  My son has never been in the majority in school or in play.  Being white has not afforded him any privilege.  In fact, because he is white, some persons of color have targeted him for theft or bullying because they have been taught that white people have things that black/brown people don't.

Citizenship is also an issue.  Because I am an American, and right now that's not very popular thanks to the sitting president, I am sometimes bullied.  My daughter, who is white as snow and 110% southern american, has had it far worse than I have because she was a teenager here.  I have never seen a person of color bullied because of their immigration status or citizenship.  Here in the GTA, the group with the greatest amount of "privilege" would have to be Asians.  Overall, Chinese and Indian and Pakistani and Korean  have a much better life than the rest.  I don't hold that against them--they have families and others who give direct support because of their culture, not their race.  They work hard, invest well, and take care of others.  I can certainly see, however, why they are thought of as privileged; they own most of the business and property in the GTA.

It is that culture of support that I believe gives success. Everyone who has needs that aren't being met is likely to see the "haves" as having some kind of privilege.  Because we have a comfortable income (because we don't own property, primarily) I can see how people would think we are privilege. That's jealousy.  That's a fairly normal reaction, give the circumstance.  Those on the outside haven't seen our struggles to get where we are and the challenges we face every day to maintain that standard.

I have a friend who is extremely successful.  He is mid 30's and mixed race, but definitely considered a person of color.  He already has a six figure income, has traveled the world and excelled in his academics.  He may have had more privilege than my daughter of the same age, but not because of race.  He had it because his parents, a white woman from the Canadian prairies and a black man who immigrated from South Africa during Apartheid, worked hard to give him the things they didn't have.  Likewise, that same daughter of mine, has a house, is expecting a second child, and does not have to work because her husband has a great job.  She may be viewed as privileged because of all that; so many others don't have the opportunities she has had.  Those opportunities, however, were not because she is white.  To claim she has "white privilege" takes away validation for rising above her failures, meeting challenges head on, and being successful in the face of almost assured failure.

I think it's past time for us to stop throwing accusations of racial
privilege.  If we want to be treated equally, we have to present ourselves as equals.  When you devalue yourself because you think others have had more opportunity than you have, you fail from the outset.  When you devalue others the same way, you alienate them from every being supportive of you, regardless of color.

If we want to be treated equally, we need to truly treat (and perceive) others as equals.  I don't argue that white privilege doesn't exist.  Certainly in some circumstances, especially in law enforcement and bigots, it most certainly does.  My objection is to  a sort of "reverse racism" where all white persons are viewed as having privilege over all persons of color.  Just as bigots need to learn a better way, persons of color who are feeling disenfranchised need to truly assess what causes them to feel that way.  We need to start talking about "isms" that don't involve color.

This is privilege.

This is not.

Monday, March 18, 2019

Presentism and the Unpopular Opinions I Hold

One of my "middle of the night epiphanies" is about presentism. In case you don't know what that is, here is the Webster's:

presentism noun
pres·​ent·​ism | \ ˈpre-zᵊn-ˌti-zəm \
Definition of presentism
: an attitude toward the past dominated by present-day attitudes and experiences

There is quite a lot of this going on and I've basically had enough. From stay at home moms being judged as "old fashioned" to the whole slavery issue, a great number of people are judging the past based on the morals of today--which may or may not be even good ones.

The latest case in point? Michael Jackson. People are pulling his products, likenesses, etc based on the new HBO documentary where Wade Robson and James Safechuck claim he was a molested them. Now, I'm not saying that MJ is completely innocent of this charge. I personally believed he behaved inappropriately with children. But the backstory here is problematic. CNN says, "Robson made statements in support of Jackson to investigators first in the '90s and testified in support of Jackson at his 2005 trial, where he was acquitted of child molestation and related charges. Safechuck at one point also denied he was molested by Jackson to investigators." In short, been there, done that. The man has been dead almost ten years. I can't see how this helps anyone in any way except maybe the 15 minutes of fame. Additionally, HBO breached a contract with the Jackson estate that specifically said they would not say anything that could be damaging to MJ.

I see this as part of the current trend of presentism. We judge Michael on behavior from when he was in his early 30's even after recognizing that there may have been a problem and that he had a really rotten time of "growing up". I'm not condoning pedophilia or any other sort of abuse. I simply think there are some issues that need to be let go of rather than revisited with modern minds.

Another example is the Kavanaugh inquiry. While I personally think he's a big dump asshat, I object to his appointment based on other factors than him drinking in high school and possibly attempting to rape someone. Sure, if a 17 year old behavior that way today, he would be drawn and quartered. Hopefully. But the reality is, times were different in 1980 and he is different now. Judging an adult man for behaviors occurring 30 years ago is absurd. Especially since one can easily judge him on his behavior during testimony, his racist leanings, and his blind love of tRump. Again, not saying his teenage behavior was right, or a good thing, I'm simply saying there are some issues that need to be let go of rather than revisited with modern minds.

Probably my biggest pet peeve is presentism around the Civil War. People of that era honestly believed that "negroes" were genetically predisposed to being lesser human beings. People of that era saw their livelihoods being legislated away. Southerners, for the most part, believed that Abe Lincoln was pandering to a select group while ignoring the very real needs of southern plantation owners. Remember, there were no factories in the south. Farming was all they had, really. Farming for food, clothing, smoking,turpentine, and booze mostly. Outlawing the use of lesser valued persons meant ruin. Again, not saying that slavery is right--just that society wasn't what we are calling "woke" back then. And just like now, the political machine blew up the evils of slavery to win the war. Not so much different than tRumps immigration policy. Northern slave holders (and yes there were many, including politicians) usually had something they could fall back on like transportation, shipping, and factory incomes. They could take the "hit" of losing labor much better than the plantations. Then it started all over again when the KKK adopted a Confederate Flag. By then we were "woke" enough to understand that white supremacy was bad, but not "woke" enough to understand that the symbols were being bastardized. Today we accept the KKK's symbol as racist and bad when its original use was not at all about bigotry--everyone (pretty much) believed that persons of color were lesser human beings back then, even in the 1950's when the KKK and the Dixiecrat Party adopted the flag and it became a symbol of segregation rather than a symbol of resistance to the government. I find it really ironic that the latest "woke" movement embraces resistance by citing the battle flag as an evil.

I think presentism is rooted in our general lack of empathy. We have become a society where we are too poor, too stressed, too busy, too whatever to take the time to see things from someone else's point of view. We don't make an effort to view things in context. It's much easier to read a headline and not the story. I might be just getting old, but "kids today" seem to not have a clue about empathy. Many of my generation did not teach it to our children. I'm very proud to say that my own kids are very empathetic. Perhaps too empathetic. Now the challenge is to raise our grandkids having no working knowledge of how vitally important empathy is. Gone are the days of close families, home economics classes, and honest patriotism. Those are the things that taught us old folks to think of others and to respect their choices.

Presentism in reverse is also shown in the anti-LGBTQ2+ folks. They are judging "behaviors" that are fine in today's culture based on what they "knew" in their childhood. Worse yet, they are continuing to teach their children these outdated notions; not because they are bad people, but because like the Southerners of the 1800's they feel the very core of their way of life is threatened. This, in one form or another, is the root of bullying and bigotry.

People talk about the future like it's a Bacharach song ("What the world needs now, is love, sweet love"). I don't think that's fair. It's unreasonable and unattainable for various reasons. Most of us can't simply love everyone. In my opinion, what the world needs is empathy. We need to step outside ourselves, our comfort zones, and our nationalism and see others through their own culture. We don't have to agree or accept another's opinions, but we damn sure don't have the right to demand they change them. We can only make and support laws that govern. We don't have the right to accost someone because they are different from us or from what we think the world should be. Someone's sexuality or religion is nobody else's business. Not even pedophiles, frat boys, or bigots. We can and must regulate their public behavior, but we don't have the right or even the responsibility to change their thinking. All we can and should do is model behaviors and beliefs we think are valid and be open to people learning a new way of life. If we don't--if we shut them down and refuse to see things as they see them, we are behaving just like the bullies. That only proves to divide us further.

On the bloody morning after, one tin soldier rides away


Links I drew from:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/presentism
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/21/entertainment/leaving-neverland-hbo-suit/index.html
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/8-things-didnt-know-confederate-flag
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSBrn6wTZSA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTBx-hHf4BE
https://face2faceafrica.com/article/how-michael-jackson-struggled-with-vitiligo-and-turned-white
http://inthesetimes.com/article/21475/brett-kavanaugh-rape-culture-christine-blasey-ford-sexual-assault
https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/563372234611976058/?lp=true
https://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/e/empathy.asp




Greta's World

I've been thinking a lot about Greta Thunberg.  She will be 17 in a couple of weeks and is an amazing young activist.  Hats off to her p...